.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

The Potemkin Immigration plan

Chertoff and his top assistant, the people to whom the border patrol reports, reveal the hollowness and political nature of the president's plan. (From this morning's DHS press conference whose sole purpose was to outline the President's plan.)

ASSISTANT SECRETARY McHALE: . . .We don't know how many helicopters we're going to put up, but we know to a near certainty that we'll have helicopters. . . We don't know where we will place censors to detect illegal movement, but it's almost a certainty that we will have censors. . . We don't know how many barriers or roads we're going to build, but clearly, we will be putting new barriers in place, and clearly, we will be building new roads . . . So your question, sir, is a fair one.

4 Comments:

  • I just posted about the gaping hole in Bush's immigration plan. If we don't have the manpower to track illegals who skip on their court dates, how will we have the manpower to track those temporary workers after their Visas expire?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:23 PM  

  • That's a pretty good point.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 5:28 PM  

  • I'm not sure why Rove/Bush/Bolten didn't pick one side of the immigrant debate to join, because it seems to me last night's speech has simply enraged the Border Security people even more (I thought Pat Buchanan was going to blow a blood vessel last night on Hardball and even Kate O'Beirne was dismissive of it) and really won't make the immigrant's rights people all that happy.

    By trying to walk a tightrope between positions and be all things to all people, I think the immigration plan hurts him more than it helps.

    Judging by the reaction from the base on Hardball, Dobbs, etc., I wouldn't be surprised to see him lose even more base support in the next set of polls taken after people have had time to digest Bush's immigration plan.

    He could fall into the 27%-28% range. Because it's not like liberals or even independents are going to start supporting him again because his immigration plan is a lot less harsh than the House plan and if he loses anymore base support he's hitting Carter/Nixon territory.

    By Blogger Reality-Based Educator, at 6:48 PM  

  • I agree, I've seen a couple of collections of Righties rants about the speech around the blogworld.

    It's the basic problem of the republican merge between business and (we'll call them kindly) nativist elements. I wrote alot about that fracture line at the end of last year.

    King Solomon's brilliance was that he threatened to split the baby. If he'd actually done so, both "mothers" would've been angry.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 6:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home