.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

1:46 PM Foley update

I really didn't want to be doing this today, Iraq is REALLY in the crapper, but...

Fordham resigns, and Denny Hastert is trying to tie it all up with a neat little bow around Fordham's neck.
Those sources said Fordham, a former chief of staff for Congressman Mark Foley, had urged Republican leaders last spring not to raise questionable Foley e-mails with the full Congressional Page Board, made up of two Republicans and a Democrat.

"He begged them not to tell the page board," said one of the Republican sources.....

People familiar with Fordham's side of the story, however, said Fordham was being used as a scapegoat by Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert.

They said Fordham had repeatedly warned Hastert's staff about Foley's "problem" with pages, but little was done.


As Aravosis says: "You mean the entire House leadership wanted to report the scary child sex predator but a single staffer recommended otherwise, so there was nothing they could do?" (He has more.)

And, what exactly is David Corn saying about this list that's going around "of top-level Republican congressional aides who are gay?" "There's anger among House Republicans at what an unidentified House GOPer called a "network of gay staffers and gay members who protect each other and did the Speaker a disservice."

Are the Republicans really about to conduct a gay witch hunt trying to blame a gay conspiracy rather than their leadership? (Maybe the Republicans would know who to trust if all the homosexuals wore a pink triangle.)

And, One more bit to banish another effort to dimish all this. There's been an effort to claim that the Page in question was 21. That claim on a blog has been pulled down.
RAW STORY can verify that the young man in question is not the Congressional page from the emails that originally surfaced. The recipient of those is currently 17 (and was 16 at the time of the correspondence)......

ABC has stated that they are in possession of chat logs from as much as five years back.

8 Comments:

  • W/ Fordham saying he alerted hastert's office two years ago about foley, the CW seems to be that Hastert is gone by the end of the week. Bay Buchanan said she thought he would be gone by the end of the day.

    Yikes.

    And I have to tell you, how Laura Bush could still attend a Reynolds fundraiser after all that has come out is beyond me. The Novak story that reynolds urged Foley to run for re-election even after he knew about the eamils Foley had sent to the underage boy is really reprehensible.

    By Blogger Reality-Based Educator, at 4:04 PM  

  • I just read about Fordham's counterclaim. I believe him, but I'm not sure of his shading.

    I thought about the Laura thing a little bit. It was already booked, already sold to the donors so cancelling would've been a big statement (as is not cancelling,) but they certainly could have kept the photogs out.

    Another of those candidates I like for no real reason, Tammy Duckworth is polling ahead. (+5)

    (And what are you doing listening to bay buchanan. I'm assuming Hardball.)

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 5:26 PM  

  • Bay was on w/ Wolf. The last three times I've seen her on CNN (Sunday night, Monday afternoon, Wednesday afternoon) she has been irate about the leadership's handling of this matter.

    By Blogger Reality-Based Educator, at 6:30 PM  

  • Yeha, I caught a snippet later in the day. I really think he's going to have to resign.

    Somebody, maybe schuster said that the bigwig Republicans were getting together to figure out who was going to tell him.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 8:27 PM  

  • I thought about the Laura thing a little bit. It was already booked,...

    I don't buy it. A simple "scheduling conflict" or "travel delay" or "feeling under the weather" -- even a terror threat from one of those "necessary" warrantless wiretap -- and Laura isn't playing nicey-nice with a pervert cover up.

    By Blogger -epm, at 9:36 PM  

  • I don't know. I think that if she doesn't show, Reynolds probably loses that seat. It's already close, and I don't think he survives that taint.

    She had to go.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 10:10 PM  

  • She had to go.

    Had to go as in "had to go to show support for any creep with an R after his name in order to maintain monarchical power," not "had to go because it was the decent thing to do."

    By Blogger -epm, at 9:23 AM  

  • Oh yeah, no argument there. I'm working on the assumption that politics trumps morality.

    Do you have any reason that statement is not operative with the Bush White House?

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 6:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home