.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Born at the Crest of the Empire

Friday, November 03, 2006

Political bits

Added: President Slimy. "Interesting timing to declare federal aid on its way to the Show-Me State just as the President plans a day of campaigning there. Be sure to Note the dates of the storms.....severe storms during the period of July 19-21, 2006."

Added:
Chris Matthews destroys Mike Dewine. "Don't you feel embarrassed you're doing this, Senator?"

Added: This chart and commentary argues the pivotal week of the campaign was the Woodward/NIE/Foley week. (That was the week the Republican 9/11 campaign strategy collapsed.)

Added: Unsurprisingly, the Neocons turn on Bush.

Allen is out of money, and the early voter turnout in northern Virginia seems to bode well for Webb.

Pederson gaining on Kyl. This would be a wave.

Rothenberg predicts Dem Senate takeover.

President "sports page." (2nd section.)

A coal executive in West Virginia is giving $1.8 million to defeat state Democrats in a PAC called, "And for the Sake of the Kids." (Isn't the coal industry always about the kids?)

The Foley report won't come out before the election. Surprised?

FBI director Mueller warns employees about leaking investigations, "after recent news articles disclosed criminal inquiries involving incumbent lawmakers, mainly House Republicans."

Too funny. Deborah Pryce walked out of an interview with CNN Radio when asked about Iraq, later saying, "What's happening in Iraq is not a direct reflection on me."

Rep. Sweeney admits that State Troopers were called to his house for a "domestic disturbance," but claims inaccuracies in the police report.

And, Will Haggard depress evangelical turnout? That seems to be the talking point today.

*** I will probably update this post throughout the day.

9 Comments:

  • George Allen = Republican "fiscal responsibility"

    By Blogger zen, at 10:34 AM  

  • Spent everything he had, just to tread water. I do find some justice that his racism has cost him so much.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 1:19 PM  

  • The Haggard stuff is fascinating, especially with it already being partially confirmed (although I'm still wondering what "partial" guilt is on this--it was only once every 2 months or what?).

    I definitely support outing in situations such as this where some is a clear proponent of discrimination and repression. In my mind, however, he hasn't become any more objectionable. I oppose monogamy and forced heterosexuality and I support legalization of drugs and prostitution. His problem is bigotry and that's been true all along. See my post
    here.

    I do think there will be issues with conservative religious turnout. First it was Foley (so their Congressional reps are duping them), then it was David Kuo (so their President was duping them) and now its Haggard (so their major evangelical leaders are duping them). Evangelical political engagement in America has come and gone in waves--I think its possible that we'll look back on this election as a turning point in their disengagement.

    ---
    le-enfant-terrible.blogspot.com

    By Blogger mephi, at 1:35 PM  

  • Check the above post, he made a statement of sorts to the reporters who had camped out in front of his house.

    I agree on the outing. I find it morally slippery, but once you begin preaching bigotry, you're fair game.

    And as for turnout stuff, I really don't know enough about the evangelical structure to make a call. I mean, he was obviosly a high muckity-muck, but was he powerful behind the scenes or did he have a huge direct following?

    Is this like Jim Baker where millions listened to him?

    I just don't know. If it's the latter, than yeah, huge blow. If it's just a power figure, I don't know.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 1:47 PM  

  • Gee, it's like the Kerry story never happened.

    By Blogger Reality-Based Educator, at 2:46 PM  

  • Funny, that. Timing couldn't have been better.

    There had been a rumor of another Democratic bomb they were holding back.

    It could well be local around the Colo gay marriage initiative, in fact, I think that's more likely.

    Just mentioning it.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 3:07 PM  

  • He had something like a 14,000 member church. Definitely a big player.

    ---
    le-enfant-terrible.blogspot.com

    By Blogger mephi, at 4:21 PM  

  • That'll certainly affect that congressional race, and probably the Colo gay marriage thing, but did he have a national following?

    I mean, are people going to be personally shocked that THIS GUY did all this, or is the turnout effect supposed to be by general impression, "they're all like that."

    Again, when Jim Baker went down, there were people who were personally hurt that Jim Baker went down.

    Or maybe a better example would be Joel Osteen who churches about a mile from here, but has that best selling book and a national following.

    You know what I'm asking?

    Because if we're talking turnout, those would be two very different effects.

    Mike

    By Blogger mikevotes, at 4:50 PM  

  • With each passing hour, it seems, some Repub or another stoops to a new moral and/or ethical low, peeling back the veil covering the very dark and rotten soul of the neo-Repub subspecies within the Republican party. But what really stuns me is how many Americans seem to think this is just A-OK...

    If the American public returns this degenerate crop of Machiavellian neo-Repubs to power in both houses of Congress next week, I'll find myself giving some very serious thought to moving out of this asylum once known as "The land of the free, and home of the brave." It's like being stuck in an abusive relationship; at some point you have to move away from the abuse or you'll lose your soul as well.

    By Blogger -epm, at 7:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home