That's what I've been thinking.....
If I had been told my primary wasn't going to count, I probably wouldn't have voted. (A TPM two-fer.)
You would think the groups most likely to vote in a non-counting primary would be the most regular of voters, women, over 65, while the least likely to vote in a primary they were told wouldn't count would be young, irregular, and first time voters.
How would that turnout shape the results of Fla/Mich?
You would think the groups most likely to vote in a non-counting primary would be the most regular of voters, women, over 65, while the least likely to vote in a primary they were told wouldn't count would be young, irregular, and first time voters.
How would that turnout shape the results of Fla/Mich?
posted by mikevotes at
6:16 AM
2 Comments:
Given the choice between voting for Hillary or uncommitted in the MI primary, I chose to vote for Ron Paul in the GOP primary instead. If they had a redo with Obama's name on the ballot, Hillary would lose big time.
By
Lew Scannon, at 10:52 PM
That's generally my point.
I'm not so sure he would win by a huge amount, but it would be far more Obama than even the settlement arrived at yesterday.
By
mikevotes, at 10:45 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home